Browse By Unit
15 min read•july 11, 2024
Eric Beckman
Eric Beckman
Source: Marco Polo (through ghostwriter Rustichello), Italian merchant who spent 17 years in the court of Kublai Khan, in his book, A Description of the World, 1298.
The grand khan, having obtained this signal victory [over a challenger to his rule], returned to great pomp and triumph to the capital city…[as] was his usual practice [performing rituals for holy books] upon each Christian festival…he observed the same at the festivals of the Saracens [Muslims], Jews, and idolaters [polytheists who worship idols]….
Upon leaving the city …during which you are continually passing towns and castles, of which the inhabitants are idolaters, have silk in abundance, and export it in considerable quantities, you reach the city of Unguen. This place is remarkable for a great manufacture of sugar, which is sent…for the supply of the court. Previously to…being…under the dominion of the grand khan, the natives were unacquainted with the art of manufacturing sugar of a fine quality, and boiled it in such an imperfect manner, that when left to cool it remained in the state of a dark-brown paste…. But at the time when this city became subject to his majesty’s government, there happened to be at the court some persons from Babylon [Cairo, Egypt] who were skilled in the process…instructed the inhabitants in the mode of refining the sugar.
…After five days’ journey, you arrive at the noble city of Zai-tun [now Quanzhou, China] , which has a port on the seacoast celebrated for…shipping, loaded with merchandise….The quantity of pepper imported there is so considerable that what is carried to Alexandria to supply the demand of the western parts of the world, is trifling in comparison….
Use the passage above and your understanding of World History to answer the following questions:
The AP World Exam loves trade questions. Here’s an original question for practice! Note: this is more primary source text than the amount that accompanies most AP History questions, but it is good for practice.
Recommended Resources
- You have multiple pieces of evidence that satisfy the “identify” prompt: Buddhism, South Asia to Southeast Asia, and merchants along Indian Ocean trade routes.
- This answer clearly explains causation. The word “allowed” in the last sentence is key as it signals that you are explaining cause and effect.
- Effectively analyzes Polo’s point of view as a former member of Kublai Khan’s court.
- “Knowledge” is not quite specific enough to count as evidence. You would need an example to count as evidence.
- You successfully explain why the Mongol empire created the conditions for greater exchange. Flying cash was a Chinese institution, not interregional, but there is enough in the sentences on the Mongols to earn the point.
- This would earn a sourcing point, because you are explaining how context and audience influenced Polo’s work.
- Champa rice is an example of exchange, but it went from Champa, in today’s Vietnam, to China. You are correct about the effects. I think that this would probably count as evidence on the AP Exam despite the mistake.
- This explanation could use one more thought that connects “safe” with greater trade.
- This is an effective analysis of the intended audience affected the passage.
- You have twice as much as need, but both parts are effective: Indian Ocean and Timbuktu.
- This is effective because you explain how the Mongol Empire boosted Silk Road trade.
- This effectively connects Polo’s POV as a merchant to the content of the text: details about commerce.
- You have more than enough evidence, and the House of Wisdom is an appropriate example.
- The middle section of this is not necessary for the prompt, although it is accurate. Be sure to focus on analysis, as opposed to description. The last two sentences do effectively address the prompt by explain how the Mongol Empire facilitated exchange.
- Excellent analysis of the impact of Polo’s POV as a merchant. The first two sentences would probably be enough to earn the point.
- Diffusion of Islam by merchants is evidence of exchange. This would be stronger with a place, ex. Indian Ocean, and has more explanation than is needed for an “identify” question. Earns the point.
- This efficiently explains the role of the Mongol Empire in supporting exchange. Earns the point.
- Here you are shifting from audience to purpose in your analysis. There is no reason to think Polo’s book was targeted at merchants, because it was written by a ghostwriter who we can assume wanted a wide audience.
One interregional exchange in Afro-Eurasia in the period before c. 1450 CE that is not described in the passage was the spread of religion. With the migration of people, religion started to fuse and coexist with other religions to create new ones. One religion in China fused the abstract ideas of Daoism and Buddhism to create Neo-Confucianism.
One cause of the interregional exchanges described by Marco Polo was the Pax Mongolica. The Pax Mongolica was a time of peace and prosperity among the Mongols. They settled into cities and leader, Genghis Khan ordered soldiers to protect the Silk Roads for safe trade. This started the third golden age of the Silk Roads, which facilitated the immense spread of interregional exchanges.
Marco Polo’s intended audience were the Europeans. He wrote about all of the wonders he experienced in China to show Europeans how lavishly they were living. The Europeans were skeptical of Polo’s stories of China being a place of innovation and prosperity on such a grand scale. Polo inspired Europeans to follow his routes through China to see the wonders of things such as silk clothing, paper money, and it being an immense center of trade.
- Buddhism going to China and mixing with indigenous belief systems is evidence of cultural diffusion. This would earn a point.
- This answer is more descriptive than analytic. It might earn a point, but it would be strong with an explanation of how Mongolian rule, including safety, contributed to the third age.
- Polo did inspire Europeans, including Christopher Columbus, but this is not necessarily sourcing analysis. We’re not sure what Polo’s purpose was, but it could have been to entertain since this started as stories that he told in prison.
- This includes multiple pieces of specific evidence, although Swahili is in East Africa, not West Africa. This mistake would not cancel out the other accurate evidence.
- This explains how Mongol rule encourage trade, especially the sentence beginning “Because there were…” This signals causation, and since you back it up with analysis and evidence it works.
- This may be successful sourcing. We don’t really know what Polo’s intent was, but you are right that he was probably surprised at the higher level of development. On the other hand, Venice was a fairly prosperous and sophisticated.
- West Africa, Islam, and merchants work together as evidence; and, you use Mansa Musa correctly has an example of the effect of cultural diffusion.
- This answer stays focused on explanation. Words like “allowed” and “due to” set you up to reason historically.
- You are right that Polo’s audience would have been unfamiliar with Eurasia (though many would have had some idea from other accounts or merchants). This doesn’t explain his focus or word choice, though.
- Islamic missionaries are evidence of cultural diffusion. This would earn a point.
- I’m not sure if this would earn a point, because it is more descriptive than explanatory. You do cover key points about the Mongols and trade, but aim for stronger language that fills in how or why change happened.
- This analysis of Polo’s POV helps to understand his view of China. Well done.
- Trans-Saharan trade + Mansa Musa + Mali + Islam = evidence, which was what an “identify” question measures.
- You clearly explaining how Mongol rule led to more trading.
- This analysis shifts from intended audience to purpose. Although Polo was a merchant, his audience was broader. Polo told these stories while in prison and his ghostwriter was most likely looking to sell as many books as possible.
<< Hide Menu
15 min read•july 11, 2024
Eric Beckman
Eric Beckman
Source: Marco Polo (through ghostwriter Rustichello), Italian merchant who spent 17 years in the court of Kublai Khan, in his book, A Description of the World, 1298.
The grand khan, having obtained this signal victory [over a challenger to his rule], returned to great pomp and triumph to the capital city…[as] was his usual practice [performing rituals for holy books] upon each Christian festival…he observed the same at the festivals of the Saracens [Muslims], Jews, and idolaters [polytheists who worship idols]….
Upon leaving the city …during which you are continually passing towns and castles, of which the inhabitants are idolaters, have silk in abundance, and export it in considerable quantities, you reach the city of Unguen. This place is remarkable for a great manufacture of sugar, which is sent…for the supply of the court. Previously to…being…under the dominion of the grand khan, the natives were unacquainted with the art of manufacturing sugar of a fine quality, and boiled it in such an imperfect manner, that when left to cool it remained in the state of a dark-brown paste…. But at the time when this city became subject to his majesty’s government, there happened to be at the court some persons from Babylon [Cairo, Egypt] who were skilled in the process…instructed the inhabitants in the mode of refining the sugar.
…After five days’ journey, you arrive at the noble city of Zai-tun [now Quanzhou, China] , which has a port on the seacoast celebrated for…shipping, loaded with merchandise….The quantity of pepper imported there is so considerable that what is carried to Alexandria to supply the demand of the western parts of the world, is trifling in comparison….
Use the passage above and your understanding of World History to answer the following questions:
The AP World Exam loves trade questions. Here’s an original question for practice! Note: this is more primary source text than the amount that accompanies most AP History questions, but it is good for practice.
Recommended Resources
- You have multiple pieces of evidence that satisfy the “identify” prompt: Buddhism, South Asia to Southeast Asia, and merchants along Indian Ocean trade routes.
- This answer clearly explains causation. The word “allowed” in the last sentence is key as it signals that you are explaining cause and effect.
- Effectively analyzes Polo’s point of view as a former member of Kublai Khan’s court.
- “Knowledge” is not quite specific enough to count as evidence. You would need an example to count as evidence.
- You successfully explain why the Mongol empire created the conditions for greater exchange. Flying cash was a Chinese institution, not interregional, but there is enough in the sentences on the Mongols to earn the point.
- This would earn a sourcing point, because you are explaining how context and audience influenced Polo’s work.
- Champa rice is an example of exchange, but it went from Champa, in today’s Vietnam, to China. You are correct about the effects. I think that this would probably count as evidence on the AP Exam despite the mistake.
- This explanation could use one more thought that connects “safe” with greater trade.
- This is an effective analysis of the intended audience affected the passage.
- You have twice as much as need, but both parts are effective: Indian Ocean and Timbuktu.
- This is effective because you explain how the Mongol Empire boosted Silk Road trade.
- This effectively connects Polo’s POV as a merchant to the content of the text: details about commerce.
- You have more than enough evidence, and the House of Wisdom is an appropriate example.
- The middle section of this is not necessary for the prompt, although it is accurate. Be sure to focus on analysis, as opposed to description. The last two sentences do effectively address the prompt by explain how the Mongol Empire facilitated exchange.
- Excellent analysis of the impact of Polo’s POV as a merchant. The first two sentences would probably be enough to earn the point.
- Diffusion of Islam by merchants is evidence of exchange. This would be stronger with a place, ex. Indian Ocean, and has more explanation than is needed for an “identify” question. Earns the point.
- This efficiently explains the role of the Mongol Empire in supporting exchange. Earns the point.
- Here you are shifting from audience to purpose in your analysis. There is no reason to think Polo’s book was targeted at merchants, because it was written by a ghostwriter who we can assume wanted a wide audience.
One interregional exchange in Afro-Eurasia in the period before c. 1450 CE that is not described in the passage was the spread of religion. With the migration of people, religion started to fuse and coexist with other religions to create new ones. One religion in China fused the abstract ideas of Daoism and Buddhism to create Neo-Confucianism.
One cause of the interregional exchanges described by Marco Polo was the Pax Mongolica. The Pax Mongolica was a time of peace and prosperity among the Mongols. They settled into cities and leader, Genghis Khan ordered soldiers to protect the Silk Roads for safe trade. This started the third golden age of the Silk Roads, which facilitated the immense spread of interregional exchanges.
Marco Polo’s intended audience were the Europeans. He wrote about all of the wonders he experienced in China to show Europeans how lavishly they were living. The Europeans were skeptical of Polo’s stories of China being a place of innovation and prosperity on such a grand scale. Polo inspired Europeans to follow his routes through China to see the wonders of things such as silk clothing, paper money, and it being an immense center of trade.
- Buddhism going to China and mixing with indigenous belief systems is evidence of cultural diffusion. This would earn a point.
- This answer is more descriptive than analytic. It might earn a point, but it would be strong with an explanation of how Mongolian rule, including safety, contributed to the third age.
- Polo did inspire Europeans, including Christopher Columbus, but this is not necessarily sourcing analysis. We’re not sure what Polo’s purpose was, but it could have been to entertain since this started as stories that he told in prison.
- This includes multiple pieces of specific evidence, although Swahili is in East Africa, not West Africa. This mistake would not cancel out the other accurate evidence.
- This explains how Mongol rule encourage trade, especially the sentence beginning “Because there were…” This signals causation, and since you back it up with analysis and evidence it works.
- This may be successful sourcing. We don’t really know what Polo’s intent was, but you are right that he was probably surprised at the higher level of development. On the other hand, Venice was a fairly prosperous and sophisticated.
- West Africa, Islam, and merchants work together as evidence; and, you use Mansa Musa correctly has an example of the effect of cultural diffusion.
- This answer stays focused on explanation. Words like “allowed” and “due to” set you up to reason historically.
- You are right that Polo’s audience would have been unfamiliar with Eurasia (though many would have had some idea from other accounts or merchants). This doesn’t explain his focus or word choice, though.
- Islamic missionaries are evidence of cultural diffusion. This would earn a point.
- I’m not sure if this would earn a point, because it is more descriptive than explanatory. You do cover key points about the Mongols and trade, but aim for stronger language that fills in how or why change happened.
- This analysis of Polo’s POV helps to understand his view of China. Well done.
- Trans-Saharan trade + Mansa Musa + Mali + Islam = evidence, which was what an “identify” question measures.
- You clearly explaining how Mongol rule led to more trading.
- This analysis shifts from intended audience to purpose. Although Polo was a merchant, his audience was broader. Polo told these stories while in prison and his ghostwriter was most likely looking to sell as many books as possible.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.